sideeffect

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Intel N100 Gen 12 and video acceleration #48834
    sideeffect
    Participant

    That’s great news I will test it out soon.

    in reply to: Intel N100 Gen 12 and video acceleration #47219
    sideeffect
    Participant

    I don’t have mfx installed anymore because mfx is part of Intel Media SDK and Intel Media SDK doesn’t work with generation 12 or newer GPU’s. Intel Media SDK has been discontinued since 2022 and mfx is legacy.

    Libmfx is deprecated and I think NoMachine needs to support libvpl or VA-API if it is to support hardware acceleration on newer Intel chips. When building FFmpeg you need to choose either libmfx or libvpl you can’t use both and libvpl is needed for OneVPL.

    Libvpl and Onevpl are working perfectly fine on my system and I can use Quicksync in Handbrake or ffmpeg via VA-API or Vulkan. I tried hard to get mfx working and it just wouldn’t for me on this chip.

    Hardware Quicksync FFmpeg – https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Hardware/QuickSync

     

    in reply to: Intel N100 Gen 12 and video acceleration #47121
    sideeffect
    Participant

    Hi Britgirl, Sure I will send some logs soon. Cool little PC’s these are. Makes a great low power docker server and transcoder for Jellyfin. 🙂

    I think the issue could be with ffmpeg. I am using latest build so I can use the newest MPV with Vulkan support and libplacebo tone mapping but newer ffmpeg builds use -libvpl and not -libmfx for Intel Quick sync. I don’t think it’s possible to build ffmpeg with both flags. I think libmfx is becoming deprecated.

    I hope NoMachine can move towards supporting libvpl because it seems that going forward that will provide the best level of hardware acceleration support on new Intel CPU’s and it has legacy support for older CPU’s.

     

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)